Decisions about a manuscript should be based only on its importance, originality,
clarity, and relevance to the publication scope and content. Studies with negative
results despite adequate power, or those challenging previously published work,
should receive equal consideration.
There should be an explicit written policy on the procedure that will be followed
if an author appeals a decision. If a published paper is subsequently found to have
errors or major flaws, the Editor should take responsibility for promptly correcting
the written record in the publication. The specific content of the correction may
address whether the errors originated with the author or the publication. The correction
should be listed in the table of contents to ensure that it is linked to the article
to which it pertains in public databases.
Ratings of review quality and other performance characteristics of editors should
be periodically assessed to assure optimal publication performance, and must contribute
to decisions on reappointment. Individual performance data must be confidential.
These performance measures should also be used to assess changes in process that
might improve the performance.
|